On “NET NEUTRALITY”

On 8th February 2016, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) passed an order which barred differential pricing of data based on its content by internet service providers. This is in the wake of a concerted campaign by Facebook, which in collaboration with some telecom companies like Reliance, wanted to offer a service known as “Free Basics” by which Facebook would provide free of cost access only to a number of websites chosen by it on the basis of some criteria laid down by Facebook itself.
Facebook argued that such programs would open up enormous opportunities for tens of millions of people in countries like India so that they could have access to education, information, jobs and more. It said that bringing hundreds of millions of people online at a cost affordable to them is necessary for rapid progress of mankind. It must be pointed out here that with more than 4 billion US$ per year in advertising revenue and 1.2 billion monthly active users, Facebook is much more than just a social networking site – it’s a shrewdly run monopoly corporation, worth more than US$100 billion. Its plan to roll out “Free Basics” was ebidently intended to bolster its already preeminent position in the market; and furthermore, to put itself in a position whereby companies wanting more people visiting their websites would have to ally themselves with Facebook. In short, it wanted to increase its dominance of the internet. Facebook reportedly spent over Rs 400 crore in advertisements in recent months to garner support for its “Free Basics” program.  
A number of other companies and organisations in India and abroad opposed the “Free Basics” program. They argued that it would put all other websites which were not part of the “Free Basics” platform at a disadvantage as they would receive much less visitors and hence make less money. They said that on our countries airwaves, it should be ensured that every mobile carrier in India offered every person in India “the full internet” and not just “some small corner of the internet chosen by Facebook”. They likened the Facebook program to a “land grab” on government property. With the growing importance of the internet as a medium to conduct trade and business, it was hardly thinkable that the capitalists of India would like to be acquiescent to Facebook. Not only could the government and regulators not defend the outrageous lie of Facebook that they were promoting Free Basics for altruistic reasons, they also did not want to put all their eggs in one basket controlled by Facebook. In the event, TRAI has promulgated its’ order on Feb 8th, which effectively seals the fate of programs like “Free Basics” of Facebook and other ‘zero rated’ plans.
The bourgeois media however, makes out that the government and its regulators are great champions of “freedom”. According to them, the TRAI ruling is “pioneering”, and “India has joined a select few countries that have protected net neutrality and barred zero-rating services”. However, it should be clear to the working class that the capitalists of India merely just did not want to be at the mercy of Facebook when it comes to traffic to their websites and increased business opportunities.
The big bourgeoisie of India, which clearly harbours imperialist ambitions, has only shown in this instance that it can take a stand that is “independent” but which in reality is merely to safeguard its’ own current interests. The manner in which the leader of the students’ union of Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) has been arrested on charges of sedition 12.02.16, just for taking a position that the execution of Afzal Guru was unfair, shows that the Indian state is hardly a champion of freedom of conscience and freedom of expression. True freedoms for the working masses can be guaranteed only when state power is wielded by the toiling people of India.
Yours truly,
Naresh Natarajan, Delhi

Tag:   

Share Everywhere

policy    Net neutrality    internet    Feb 16-29 2016    Letters to Editor    Economy     Popular Movements    

PARTY DOCUMENTS

thumb

 

Parties of the capitalist class claim that there is no
alternative to the program of globalisation,liberalisation
and privatisation. The truth is thatthere IS an alternative.

The alternative is to reorient the economy to fulfil people’s
needs instead of fulfilling capitalist greed. This is the
program for the Navnirman of India.

Click on the thumbnail of the election manifesto of a CGPI
supported candidate for Lok Sabha to download the PDF.

 

thumbnail

This document, What Kind of Party?, was presented by
Comrade Lal Singh on behalf of the Central Committee
of the Communist Ghadar Party of India to the Second
National Consultative Conference held December 29-30, 1993.

Click on the cover image to download the PDF

 

Click to Download PDFThe first part of this pamphlet is an analysis of facts and phenomena to identify and expose the real aims behind the Note Ban. The second part is devoted to a critical appraisal of the government’s claims that it will reduce inequality, corruption and terrorism. The third part is what Communist Ghadar Party believes is the real solution to these problems and the immediate program of action towards that solution.

(Click thumbnail to download PDF)

These Elections are a FarceInterview with Comrade Lal Singh, General Secretary of Communist Ghadar Party of India by Comrade Chandra Bhan, Editor of Mazdoor Ekta Lehar

(Click thumbnail to download PDF)

Manifesto 2014Unite around the program to reconstitute the Indian Republic and reorient the economy to ensure prosperity and protection for all!

(Click thumbnail to download PDF)

Click to Download PDFInterview with Comrade Lal Singh, General Secretary of Communist Ghadar Party of India

by Comrade Chandra Bhan, Editor of Mazdoor Ekta Lehar

(Click thumbnail to download PDF)