British way out of capitalist crisis: Aid for bourgeoisie and betrayal, fee hike for students

Britain exposed the hypocrisy of capitalist democracies before its own people last week as its government rode roughshod over opposition from the country’s students and teachers, ramming through legislation for an unprecedented hike in university fees.

Leaving riot police to answer tens of thousands of students and teachers protesting outside Parliament, the “people’s representatives” in the House of Commons passed a law that allows universities to hike a tuition fee cap from 3,290 to 9000 pound sterling a year.

Most higher education students in the UK are already indebted and families and the fee hike will force families to make a choice between higher education and an even deeper debt trap. No student or teacher group has supported the fee hike and most universities have opposed the move too.

The move is a blatant betrayal because the Liberal Democrats (LibDems) who are a part of the ruling Coalition, campaigned against any fee hike in the lead up to the general elections in May. Many of the protesting students said they voted for the LibDems because of their stand on fee hikes.

But it is only in keeping with the charade of democracy that capitalist States portray, ruthlessly ignoring their people’s will at key moments of crisis for their system. Polls across Britain, the US, Spain and several other countries prior to the invasion of Iraq in 2003 showed over 80 per cent people in each of these countries opposing the war. The governments of these countries went ahead with the invasion and the war.

The hike in fee cap for universities follows a sustained campaign by the Russell Group of 20 top universities including Cambridge and Oxford to be allowed the freedom to set fees according to the market.

This pressure fed into the plans of both the earlier Labour government and the current Coalition government to use the economic recession as an argument to withdraw the State’s responsibility from higher education.

Even as it offered financial aid packages to big industry struggling from the recession, Gordon Brown’s Labour government in 2009 set up an Independent Review of Higher Education Funding and Student Finance under Lord Browne of Madingley.

 The Browne review suggested exactly what the government and the powerful Russell Group wanted – that public funding for higher education should be reduced, and that universities be allowed to set fees based on the market.

Based on the interim recommendations of the Browne report, the Labour government and the Coalition since coming to power have decided on a massive reduction in budgetary support for higher education. The plan involves reducing the public funding contribution to the finances of British universities from 60 per cent to 40 per cent over five years. The budget cuts target teaching and research, and in particular the humanities and arts.

These cuts then helped in turn further justify the call from varsities for fee hikes. Under public pressure, the government did not leave fees completely to the market, but raised the fee cap almost threefold to 9000 pound sterling.

But why should students and teachers pay for the financial crisis created by a system that clearly does not care to listen to them? As the impact of the blatant betrayal on the people of UK sinks in, this question is bound to be raised by an increasing number of that country’s citizens. The answer will not come from the system that put them in this mess.


Share Everywhere

conscience    masses    protest    education    rights    fees    students    Dec 16-31 2010    World/Geopolitics    Rights     Popular Movements    


8 Jan General Strike

Call of the Mazdoor Ekta Committee

The all India general strike has been called to resolutely oppose the course of enriching the capitalist minority by impoverishing the toiling majority. It has been called to assert the rights that belong to workers, peasants and other toiling people who create the wealth of India.

Hum Hain Iske Malik! Hindostan Humara!

Election manifesto of a CGPI supported candidate for Lok SabhaParties of the capitalist class claim that there is no alternative to the program of globalisation,liberalisation and privatisation. The truth is that there IS an alternative.The alternative is to reorient the economy to fulfil people’s needs instead of fulfilling capitalist greed. This is the program for the Navnirman of India.

(Click thumbnail to download PDF)

5th Congress DocumentThe Report to the Fifth Congress of the Communist Ghadar Party of India, presented by Comrade Lal Singh, General Secretary of the CGPI, on behalf of its Central Committee, was discussed and adopted by the Fifth Congress of the CGPI, held in November 2016. By decision of the Fifth Congress, this report has been edited for publication.

(Click thumbnail to download PDF)

Click to Download PDFThe first part of this pamphlet is an analysis of facts and phenomena to identify and expose the real aims behind the Note Ban. The second part is devoted to a critical appraisal of the government’s claims that it will reduce inequality, corruption and terrorism. The third part is what Communist Ghadar Party believes is the real solution to these problems and the immediate program of action towards that solution.

(Click thumbnail to download PDF)

These Elections are a FarceInterview with Comrade Lal Singh, General Secretary of Communist Ghadar Party of India by Comrade Chandra Bhan, Editor of Mazdoor Ekta Lehar

(Click thumbnail to download PDF)

Manifesto 2014Unite around the program to reconstitute the Indian Republic and reorient the economy to ensure prosperity and protection for all!

There is growing realisation among workers, peasants and other self-employed people that the program of liberalisation and privatisation only serves to enrich an exploiting minority at their expense. Mass resistance is growing to this anti-worker, anti-peasant and anti-national program.

(Click thumbnail to download PDF)